ISSN 2674-8053 | Receive article updates on Telegram: https://t.me/mapamundiorg

The new OAS Parliamentary Assembly: challenges for Brazilian autonomy in the face of US influence

The Organization of American States (OAS) has played a significant role in hemispheric politics since its founding in 1948. The organization, that aims to promote democracy, human rights, security and development in the region, often finds itself under the dominant influence of the United States. This article examines the GRS resolution 3004 of 2023, which proposes the creation of a legislative structure similar to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), and how this initiative can impact the autonomy of Latin American countries, with a special focus on Brazil.

The GRS resolution 3004 of 2023 aims to strengthen democracy in the region, proposing the creation of a parliamentary assembly within the scope of the OAS. This legislative structure would have as its main objective to provide a platform for debate and the formulation of policies that promote democracy and human rights in member states. The idea is for this assembly to function in a similar way to the OSCE, offering a forum for multilateral cooperation and conflict resolution.

Yet, the creation of this structure could significantly increase the influence of the United States in the region. Historically, the United States has used the OAS as a tool to promote its political and economic interests in Latin America. For example, during the Cold War, the OAS served as a vehicle to counter the influence of communism in the region, often aligning themselves with United States foreign policies. More recently, the OAS has been criticized by some member countries for favoring North American positions in political crises in Venezuela and Nicaragua.

The new parliamentary assembly proposed by GRS 3004 may reinforce this trend. Firstly, the United States, as the largest financial contributor to the OAS, have a significant ability to influence the organization's agenda and priorities. The creation of a parliamentary assembly would give the United States another forum to exert this influence, possibly shaping discussions and decisions in line with your interests.

However, the focus should not just be on avoiding U.S. influence, but rather to guarantee the autonomy of Latin American countries, especially Brazil. The structure and functioning of a parliamentary assembly in the OAS could mirror the legislative practices and norms of the United States, further reinforcing North American cultural and political hegemony in the region. The implementation of policies and standards influenced by North American models could lead to greater dependence of Latin American countries on United States institutions and support, both in political and economic terms.

To Brazil, preserving autonomy is fundamental. The country must strive to ensure that any new legislative framework within the OAS allows for equitable participation and respects the sovereignty of member states. The creation of a parliamentary assembly could be an opportunity for Brazil to exercise more assertive leadership in the region, promoting an agenda that reflects Latin American interests and values.

Supporters of the resolution argue that the creation of a parliamentary assembly could provide a more democratic and representative platform for Latin American countries. They assert that a legislative forum would allow for greater participation and influence from all member states, promoting a more equitable distribution of power within the OAS. However, This optimistic view needs to be carefully analyzed in the context of existing power dynamics.

The proposal for a parliamentary assembly within the OAS raises complex questions about sovereignty, influence and the true nature of hemispheric cooperation. Although the stated intention of the GRS resolution 3004 of 2023 to strengthen democracy, there is legitimate concern that it could serve to further consolidate US influence in Latin America. History shows that, despite declared intentions, the OAS often reflects Washington's interests.

Therefore, while the creation of a parliamentary assembly in the OAS may appear to be a positive step towards greater cooperation and democracy, It is crucial that Latin American countries, especially Brazil, approach this initiative with caution. They must ensure that any new legislative framework is truly representative and does not become another instrument of American influence.. The implementation of safeguards and balance of power mechanisms will be essential to ensure that the parliamentary assembly serves the interests of all member states in a fair and equitable manner, promoting true democracy and cooperation in the region, while preserving Brazil's autonomy and sovereignty.

Rodrigo Cintra
Post-Doctorate in Territorial Competitiveness and Creative Industries, by Dinâmia - Center for the Study of Socioeconomic Change, of the Higher Institute of Labor and Enterprise Sciences (ISCTE, Lisboa, Portugal). PhD in International Relations from the University of Brasília (2007). He is Executive Director of Mapa Mundi. ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1484-395X